<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ardenstone &#187; cherry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ardenstone.com/tag/cherry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ardenstone.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 20:08:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Aviation</title>
		<link>http://www.ardenstone.com/2007/03/01/aviation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ardenstone.com/2007/03/01/aviation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 07:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ardenstone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cocktails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cherry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cocktail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lemon juice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maraschino liqueur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recipe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spirit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ardenstone.com/2007/03/01/aviation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the cocktail I most associate with internet drinks, mainly because cocktail bloggers and devotees seem to have revived it in the past few years. While I like an Aviation, it tends towards being a little too sweet or tart to be one of my favorites. Still, the drink is intriguing, so I find [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the cocktail I most associate with internet drinks, mainly because cocktail bloggers and devotees seem to have revived it in the past few years.  While I like an Aviation, it tends towards being a little too sweet or tart to be one of my favorites.  Still, the drink is intriguing, so I find myself returning to it.  I&#8217;ve heard that Maraska instead of Luxardo might alter it more to my liking, but for now I&#8217;ve only had Luxardo maraschino liqueur.</p>
<p>Which brings us to maraschino liqueur.  If you haven&#8217;t before, it&#8217;s worth trying but it really doesn&#8217;t taste anything like those bright red &#8220;cherries&#8221; in a jar.  There is some cherry flavor, but it&#8217;s subtle, and the liqueur is a clear syrup.  It&#8217;s powerful stuff, which is why I tend to recommend it in moderation.</p>
<div class="recipe">
Aviation</p>
<p>2 oz gin<br />
1/2 oz maraschino liqueur<br />
1/4 oz lemon juice</p>
<p>Shake over ice, garnish with a cherry.
</p></div>
<p>Now, a couple of notes:</p>
<ol>
<li>use a dry gin.  Sapphire works just fine, and I actually like it better than Plymouth in this case.  Save the aromatic gins for a martini, the maraschino is just going to fight with them.</li>
<li>Go easy on the maraschino and lemon juice.  I see both of those increased in some recipes, and I think they just take over at that point.  The lemon juice should be softening and complementing the maraschino liqueur, but not a huge presence on its own.  The maraschino liqueur, at least the Luxardo that I have, is powerful stuff.  It can easily take over your drink, which really isn&#8217;t the point.</li>
</ol>
<p align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ginsnob/407530061/" title="Aviation"><img align="center" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/160/407530061_b43f1e7537_m.jpg" width="180" height="240" alt="Aviation" /></a></p>
<p>Note that the above is me breaking a few rules.  For one thing, that&#8217;s Magellan gin, which looks pretty cool but doesn&#8217;t work very well here.  Since it works so fabulously in a martini, save it for that.  Also, I added a lemon twist, which again isn&#8217;t as good as the original recipe&#8217;s call for a cherry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ardenstone.com/2007/03/01/aviation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Manhattan Special</title>
		<link>http://www.ardenstone.com/2007/01/06/the-manhattan-special/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ardenstone.com/2007/01/06/the-manhattan-special/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 06:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ardenstone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cocktails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angostura bitters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benedictine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cherry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cocktail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recipe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spirit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweet vermouth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ardenstone.com/wp/2007/01/06/the-manhattan-special/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with browsing through cocktail blogs is that I invariably find someone else who is posting delightful, well informed information and my list of places to read increases. The Handy Snake is one of those, and I earlier wrote about Kurt&#8217;s Manhattan Special. Being a big fan of the tasty manhattan, I tried it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with browsing through cocktail blogs is that I invariably find someone else who is posting delightful, well informed information and my list of places to read increases.  <a href="http://handysnake.blogspot.com/">The Handy Snake</a> is one of those, and I earlier wrote about Kurt&#8217;s Manhattan Special.  Being a big fan of the tasty manhattan, I tried it out and was intrigued enough to recreate it with some slight modifications.  Mainly, I don&#8217;t like drinking mine on the rocks, so I just reduced the amounts and ended up changing the proportions a hair.  If you&#8217;re interested, I really recommend you check out <a href="http://handysnake.blogspot.com/2006/12/mixology-monday-gets-festive.html">the original</a>.</p>
<div class="recipe">
The Manhattan Special</p>
<p>1.5 oz rye whiskey<br />
.4 oz sweet vermouth<br />
.3 oz Benedictine<br />
2 dashes of Angostura bitters</p>
<p>Shake with ice and strain into a cocktail glass. Garnish with a cherry.</p>
<p>Note that Kurt makes a good point about wanting a strong rye to take on the Benedictine.  I always like Wild Turkey in my Manhattans, and it serves well in this case.
</p></div>
<p>What&#8217;s up with the .3 and .4oz measurements?  I tend to make a Manhattan at 3:1 rye to sweet vermouth, but that&#8217;s too weak if you then add Benedictine.  You could certainly just do 1/4 oz each of vermouth and Benedictine, but I liked it better with a hair more than that, and adding more vermouth than Benedictine.  The end result is a very soft and sweeter Manhattan.  It&#8217;s handy for those times when you want a Manhattan, but aren&#8217;t really looking forward to it standing up and socking you in the mouth for the first few sips.  Of course, I think that&#8217;s part of a good Manhattan&#8217;s charm, but this is nice to have in the recipe book.  Thanks, Kurt!</p>
<div align="center">
<img id="image132" src="http://www.ardenstone.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/manhattanspecial.jpg" alt="Manhattan Special" />
</div>
<p>Yes, there&#8217;s a cherry there but I shook it instead of stirred the drink.  This also dilutes it a hair more, in addition to making it colder quicker, which I think works well in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ardenstone.com/2007/01/06/the-manhattan-special/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

